Mars Hill Church leadership has decried “Negative Media Attention” and blamed it for a decrease in both attendance and giving.
For us ex-members and perhaps many members we see the following “trustworthy table”. The most untrustworthy from our perspective would be considered negative, and the most trustworthy would be considered positive. We consider truth as positive, and self-serving spin and obfuscation as negative. We will look at the media spin about the current Mars Hill mess from negative to positive.
Mars Hill Church communications
Full of accusation to dissenters and bloggers, lack of transparency, hides truth often.
Other Christian New Outlets (World Magazine excluded)
Usually are printing puff pieces seemingly written by Mars Hill PR firms and surrogates.
Daily Beast/Huff Post
Seems to like to pick the sensational and skew perspectives toward a biased view.
New York Times
The Seattle Times
Solid Journalism – keen to correct any errors
The Seattle Weekly
Solid and caring journalism.
The Wartburg Watch
Written with a heart for abused people
Warren Cole Smith has become the nation’s foremost investigative reporter within Evangelical circles.
Wenatchee the Hatchet
A totally accurate narrative with keen observation and a ferocious commitment to accuracy.
Daily reading for most members and ex-members of Mars Hill Church and the rest of the evangelical world
No tabloid journalist spent more time to make sure that he understood the context and accuracy of the events at Mars Hill Church than Brendan Kiley (Link)
Who would have thought that the least trustworthy of media would be Mars Hill Church and other Christian outlets, and the most trustworthy The Stranger?